The Separation of Government and Science

by ourchristiancountry on August 16, 2010


The link mentioned in this video can be found at www.brocklawley.com Follow The AA on Facebook http Follow me on Twitter twitter.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com www.youtube.com brockvsobama.blogspot.com www.blogtv.com www.stickam.com

Tagged as: , ,

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

fellowservant34 August 16, 2010 at 7:49 PM

Global warming is almost as ridiculous as molecules-to-man evolution.

Reply

1tmoch August 16, 2010 at 7:48 PM

Global freezing, global warming, global just rightness, and on and on with the scientism cult.

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 7:23 PM

@devchelle2 So, let’s look up the definition of “smear.”
“smear (verb)–to deliberately spread damaging rumors about somebody.”
(Note that the word “rumor” usually means a lie.)

Yeah, putting words in your mouth you disillusioned moron.

Reply

devchelle2 August 16, 2010 at 6:46 PM

@conservativeco “usually” means usually. Wow your not really good at this game are you? Its no fun unless you have a talent for the game. Oh well, my loss.

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 6:32 PM

@conservativeco So you really think it is god for you to breath in the exhaust from your car? How can I be a disillusioned moron if I think that we can produces cars that are better for us and that we can produces energy that is better for us and our environment. and why are most of your argument just slander?? you call me loon, idiot, moron and brain-dead. Not that constructive. But it really was enlightening to hear from you. Regards and have a skilful life. Pinge

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 6:10 PM

@PingeMusic Did you read my comment? I said that carbon DIOXIDE would “KILL YOU.” Are you really so brain dead that you couldn’t understand that and then you somehow misconscrew it so somehow I said that car exaust is good for you?

I never said that green energy is a bad thing, I simply said that to use global warming to push it threw is wrong because global warming is a lie. Stop putting words in my mouth.

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 5:30 PM

@devchelle2 I’m sorry what childish “game” are you talking about? I wasn’t playing your pathetic “games.”

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 5:25 PM

@conservativeco The interesting thing as I see it is that if we know that for example are exhausts are not god for us or the environment why do we waste time debating if global warming exists or not. And pleas stop calling me names just because I don’t believe the same thing as you.

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 4:48 PM

@PingeMusic Because people are using it to justify the confinscation of liberty, the growing of governments, flushing out the free market, ect. That is horrific. Cap and Trade is a prime example.

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 4:37 PM

@conservativeco fare enough! But if for example some parts of the free market deteriorate the environment is it not fare to regulate that part. and if you don’t like the that the government is growing fight the decisions that make it grow not the hole global warming movement coz most of us talk about it because we believe that environment is the most important thing we have part 1

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 4:35 PM

@conservativeco and that if we don’t try to change how we treats it it dose not mater if we are free or not cos then we will be dead. and about the Cap and Trade I am sorry to say that I know not enough to have a clear opinion

Reply

krisv001 August 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM

AMEN !! Great message ! So true !

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 3:05 PM

@PingeMusic So you’re saying that the robbing of liberty is justified over the lie of global warming? Yes, the enviroment is important, but there’s no real urgency as though the world is going to end tomorrow if we don’t change our lifestyle right now. We’re humans, and we’re not all-powerful enough to destroy or save the world in a blink of an eye.
Forcing things down people’s throats is totaltarian and unproductive, as well.

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 2:11 PM

@PingeMusic And though some government regulation is necessary, we’re going over the top and global warming is creating that urgency that makes us do so. When government grows, tyranny ensues, and global warming is being used to justfiy it.
And I do go after specific policies as well. The reason why I go after the whole global warming movement is because they’re not only lying and fear-mongering to gain power, which is despicable, but destroying global warming destroys the reason for policies.

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 1:29 PM

@conservativeco You say That GW is “creating the urgency to go over the top”. On that statement I have a couple of questions 1. Do you not think that it is urgent to decrease the pollution? 2. Why don’t you try to fight the specific regulations that you don’t think is necessary instead of the whole movement? 3. Do you really know for sure that GW is a face? 4. If you believe that we know that GW is not a fact do you think that we humans can go on like we are or do we have to change any way?

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 12:32 PM

@conservativeco No. (if we talk about liberty that understand that if we want to keep on being free we have to know that freedom have to sides. If we want to be free I have to stand up for your rights and you have to stand up for mine.) (Sorry different subject always a bit on the edge when it comes to freedom) :-) . We can’t save the world in a blink of an eye but when do we start tomorrow. after 10 years, or…… or when it is to late.

Reply

carlindelco August 16, 2010 at 11:43 AM

Yup it’s a dead giveaway for corruption when a person(s) who holds a view and avoids and insults any and all opposing points of view. Runs like a coward from an honest debate.. it’s an absolute certainty that they and it is a sham! There are over 30,000 scientist OPPOSED to the man made climate sham.. Great point . separation of gov and science .. never thought about that Great vid!

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 11:20 AM

@PingeMusic 1) Of course we have to stop pollution and switch energy. Though it is urgent, it’s not end of the world urgent. 2) I do fight specific regulations, but, as I already said, taking away GW takes away the need for those regulations so it’s good to fight both. 3) Yes, 100%. 4) We need to change but having governments force it is wrong. The market will fix it through time and yes government can help, but they shouldn’t force it.

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 10:33 AM

@conservativeco (1) I believe we have nearly the same opinion. (2) and 3) I don’t really think that we can be sure on this question so I believe that we have to do a bit more just because we don’t really know. 4) I really don’t believe that the market will fix anything by it self coz as I see it the market have just one purpose and that is to make money and things like better infrastructure and so on you will not make money so who will invest in that.

Reply

bobb4you August 16, 2010 at 9:45 AM

Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. This guy is great. Best wishes from Scotland. :)

Reply

conservativeco August 16, 2010 at 8:47 AM

@PingeMusic People in the market need energy to make money. So, as fossil-fuel energy prices go up do to lack of supply, there will be more of a demand for alternatives. Also, using alternatives and being “green” lately has made for good PR lately meaning that companies that do things ‘green’ make more money so more companies will switch over.

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 8:02 AM

@conservativeco Absolutely! But do we know that the supply will be gone before we have to much pollution. and do we know that company will put enough effort in inventing Green solutions before it is to late. I believe it was GM that stooped an Electrical car in the early 90′s and made the people that have bought it return it. the reason what I understand was that they did not gain enough to keep on producing it.

Reply

PingeMusic August 16, 2010 at 7:57 AM

@conservativeco another example is NASA. It would probably not exist if we have to rely on the market coz who should invest money in something that surely will not give back what you invest. Not in money maybe in knowledge but not even that is guaranteed.

Reply

TheFluffyDuck August 16, 2010 at 7:36 AM

Brooke is sooo far down the rabbit whole he cant even look over his should and see the light of reality behind him.

There is nothing I can say that probably hasnt already been said before. This guy is so emotional attached to his argument evidence that debunks his ludicrus campaign will be followed by some poetic nonsense and a snide remark.

How do people get so lost? I really wish critical thinking class were mandatory in schools.

Reply

desertTRUTH August 16, 2010 at 6:50 AM

I recently listened to an interview w/ an expert on global warming (cannot remember his name) who eventually exposed his core-view that the world is getting over-populated and it’s a travesty – he used a somber tone like it’s a sad state-of-affairs for new people to be born; I would venture to guess this view is common among global-warming proponents — when you get to the core of their motives, limiting energy will limit life.

This view is the epitome of selfish elitism, like in Nazi Germany

Reply

Leave a Comment