Publishers Weekly

Thomas Nelson, Inc. Wins 2012 Christian Book of the Year
Sacramento Bee
By Thomas Nelson NASHVILLE, Tenn., May 2, 2012 — /PRNewswire/ — For the fourth consecutive year a Thomas Nelson, Inc. title has been recognized as the ECPA's Christian Book Awards Book of the Year. At this week's Executive Leadership Summit, …
'Nearing Home' Named Christian Book of the YearPublishers Weekly

all 6 news articles »

View full post on christian – Google News

View full post on Christianpost.com > Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics

Senator Ben Nelson, D-Nebraska, the last holdout, said Saturday that he would support the bill after Senate Majority leader Harry Reid unveiled his final package of changes. Nelson had said he would filibuster the bill because it federally funded abortions.

Here’s the difference between abortion funding in the House and the Senate versions of the health care proposal, according to Paul Kane of the Washington Post.

Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing plans to cover abortion in the insurance exchanges the bill would set up. The exchanges are designed to serve individuals who lack coverage through their jobs, with most receiving federal subsidies to buy insurance. Enrollees in plans that cover abortion procedures would pay with separate checks — one for abortion, one for any other health-care services.

This was an effort to comport with the 32-year prohibition against federal funding for abortions, but the Nelson compromise is a softening of the House language, which was written by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.). The Stupak amendment forbid any insurer in the exchange “to pay for any abortion or to cover any part of the costs of any health plan that includes coverage of abortion” — a position that abortion rights advocates suggested would have led to many insurance providers dropping abortion coverage.

The Associated Press also offers a summary of the differences.

Conservative groups like Americans United for Life (AUL) and Family Research Council (FRC) sent out e-mails in opposition to Nelson’s support.

Continue reading …

View full post on Christianity Today Politics